Abrams Law Firm Featured on WESH2 News
For more information please visit: https://www.wesh.com/article/indialantic-8m-lawsuit-businesses-sound-ordinances/71473721
For more information please visit: https://www.wesh.com/article/indialantic-8m-lawsuit-businesses-sound-ordinances/71473721
Abrams Law Firm recently represented a licensed dog breeder from western Broward County at an administrative trial before a value adjustment board special magistrate on April 2, 2025. The case challenged the property appraiser’s denial of an agricultural classification application submitted nearly a year earlier. Until now, no dog breeder in Florida had received approval for agricultural classification.
This case holds particular significance because agricultural classification exempts businesses from local zoning requirements through a legal principle known as “preemption.” Under the Florida Right to Farm Act, agricultural uses are protected from restriction by local zoning regulations.
The magistrate ruled in favor of the petition, determining that the dog breeding operation qualifies as agricultural because it produces animal products that are “useful to humans”, the statutory requirement for agricultural classification. This landmark decision establishes the client as Broward County’s first agriculturally classified dog breeder and potentially among the first in the entire state.
For more information about agricultural classifications or to discuss how this precedent might apply to your business, please contact:
Phone: (954) 332-2358
Email: admin@abrams-law.com
Website: www.abramslawfirm.com
Principal Contact: Ryan Abrams, Esq. and Sydney Satz, Esq.
Practice Areas: Agricultural Law, Property Tax Appeals, Land Use & Zoning
When purchasing vacant land, commercial, or industrial property for redevelopment, conducting thorough zoning due diligence is essential. Skipping this step can lead to unforeseen complications and delays, jeopardizing the success of your project. Below is a comprehensive guide to ensure your zoning due diligence is both thorough and effective.
Steps for Zoning Due Diligence
Conclusion
Conducting zoning due diligence is a critical step in the redevelopment process. By following these steps, you can identify potential hurdles early, mitigate risks, and ensure the viability of your project. Our firm has extensive experience guiding clients through zoning and land use complexities. Contact us to ensure your redevelopment project proceeds smoothly and successfully.
When a city or county renders a development order on an entitlement application—such as for a special exception, variance, or rezoning—developers and land use attorneys should strongly consider leveraging the land use mediation process outlined in Florida Statutes §70.51. This approach can provide a cost-effective, creative, and flexible alternative to the traditional circuit court appellate process.
Overview of the Land Use Mediation Process
Under Florida law, land use mediation allows developers to challenge a development order without immediately resorting to filing a writ of certiorari in circuit court. Here’s how the process works:
Benefits of Land Use Mediation
When Mediation May Not Be Suitable
While mediation can be a powerful tool, it is not always the best option. For instance:
Conclusion
Florida’s land use mediation process under §70.51 offers a compelling alternative to immediate circuit court appeals. It provides developers and land use attorneys with additional time, confidentiality, and flexibility to resolve disputes creatively and cost-effectively. However, its success depends on the willingness of all parties to engage in good-faith negotiations.
Our firm has successfully utilized this process in past cases, demonstrating its potential to deliver favorable outcomes. If you are facing a development order dispute, contact us to evaluate whether land use mediation is the right approach for your situation.
In 2023, the Florida Legislature enacted a groundbreaking law known as the Live Local Act, which was further amended in early 2024. This legislation significantly reshapes the landscape of affordable housing development by overriding certain city and county zoning regulations. For developers, this law provides a range of opportunities to construct multifamily residential projects while meeting affordable housing requirements. Below, we explore the key provisions and the incentives that make this law a game-changer for housing in Florida.
Key Provisions of the Live Local Act
Why This Law Makes Affordable Housing Development Attractive
The Live Local Act not only relaxes zoning and development restrictions but also introduces substantial financial incentives, making affordable housing projects in Florida highly attractive. Key advantages include:
Conclusion
The Live Local Act represents a significant shift in Florida’s approach to affordable housing. By overriding restrictive zoning regulations and offering meaningful financial incentives, the law creates a pathway for developers to address housing needs while ensuring projects remain profitable. With its emphasis on transit-oriented development and streamlined processes, the law is poised to reshape communities across Florida and make affordable housing more accessible than ever before.
For developers and stakeholders looking to explore opportunities under this law, our firm provides experienced guidance to navigate the complexities of land use, zoning, and entitlement processes. Contact us today to learn how we can assist in making your project a success under the Live Local Act.
There are three primary ways to structure the purchase or sale of a business: asset purchase, stock purchase, or merger. Each has distinct advantages and disadvantages for the buyer and seller, respectively. A qualified M&A (mergers and acquisitions) attorney will help you decide which structure is best suited for your needs.
An asset purchase is where some or all of the assets of a company are purchased by a buyer. An acquisition agreement is negotiated and executed by the parties, setting forth a due diligence period and a closing date, similar to a real estate transaction. The agreement will specifically list the assets and liabilities being purchased by the prospective buyer. The result after closing is the buyer ends up with only the specific assets and liabilities listed in the acquisition agreement.
A merger is where a target company is merged with a purchasing company, or vice versa. Just as with an asset purchase, there will be a transaction agreement and a due diligence period, but there are procedures that must be followed for a plan of merger to be approved by the shareholders of the target company and shareholders of purchasing company. There are different types of mergers, and it can get complicated. Suffice it to say that the target company can either merge with the purchasing company, thereby extinguishing the legal existence of the target company; or alternatively, the purchasing company can merge with the target company, thereby extinguishing the legal existence of the purchasing company. The result in either case is the merged company ends up with all of the assets and liabilities of the target company.
A stock purchase is a third way to structure an acquisition. This is accomplished through a stock purchase agreement and there is also a due diligence period. With a stock purchase, the buyer seeks to gain ownership of all of the target company’s shares. The purchasing company would then own all of the target company’s assets and liabilities, making the target company its wholly owned subsidiary. A risk with this transaction is that all shareholders may not sign off on the sale or exchange of their stock, although the deal can be structured to avoid this result.
The structure of the purchase can be a subject of intense negotiations between the buyer and seller, because each structure type has varying advantages and disadvantages for each the buyer and seller.
An asset purchase is generally the preferred structure for the buyer because, if done properly, it eliminates the risk of taking on hidden liabilities of the target company, and it also generally provides superior tax advantages for the buyer. The primary tax advantage is that it allows the buyer to claim a ‘stepped-up basis’ in those assets with appreciating value, which generally will reduce the buyer’s tax burden. However, an asset purchase is a less attractive option for a seller that files as a C Corporation, because it can result in double taxation. This is because the C Corporation would be taxed for a liquidation at the corporate level, and the amounts distributed to shareholders would be taxed again as capital gains. The Seller also could be subject to taxes on deprecation recapture on some of the assets sold. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a lengthy discussion on tax law is beyond the scope of this article.
On the other hand, mergers and stock purchases are generally preferable for Sellers for three reasons. First, the Seller usually desires to sell its entire business because it is a simpler process. Second, the Seller does not have to worry about continuing liabilities, or how to dispose of assets not purchased by the buyer. Third, mergers and stock purchases provide tax advantages for the seller, including the avoidance of the double taxation problem for C Corporations and the avoidance of paying taxes on depreciation recapture. The tax consequences should be more thoroughly analyzed with the assistance of a qualified CPA. Your attorney in the transaction will probably recommend bringing in other experts where appropriate to help guide the process so that you receive the greatest benefit for your bargain.
There’s a lot to consider when thinking about selling or buying a business. Ryan A. Abrams, Esq. is skilled in M&A transactions, and can guide you the process so that you only have to worry about the business side of things. Call us today.